RESUMO
Although coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-induced changes in laboratory parameters in patients upon admission have been well-documented, information on their temporal changes is limited. The present study describes the laboratory trends and the effect of dexamethasone treatment on these parameters, in patients with COVID-19 in the intensive care unit (ICU). Routine laboratory parameters, namely white blood cell (WBC), neutrophil, lymphocyte and platelet (PLT) counts, fibrinogen, C-reactive protein (CRP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and albumin concentrations, were recorded upon admission to the ICU and, thereafter, on days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 21; these values were compared between survivors and non-survivors, as well as between those who were treated with dexamethasone and those who were not. Among the 733 patients in the ICU, (mean age, 65±13 years; 68% males; ICU mortality rate 45%; 76% of patients treated with dexamethasone), the WBC and neutrophil counts were persistently high in all patients, without significant differences over the first 15 days. Initially, low lymphocyte counts exhibited increasing trends, but remained higher in survivors compared to non-survivors (P=0.01). The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was persistently elevated in all patients, although it was significantly higher in non-survivors compared to survivors (P<0.001). The PLT count was initially increased in all patients, although it was significantly decreased in non-survivors over time. The fibrinogen and LDH values remained similarly elevated in all patients. However, the increased levels of CRP, which did not differ between patients upon admission, further increased in non-survivors compared to survivors after day 10 (P=0.001). Declining trends in albumin levels over time, overall, with a significant decrease in non-survivors compared to survivors, were observed. Dexamethasone treatment significantly affected the temporal progression of fibrinogen and CRP in survivors and that of NLR in non-survivors. On the whole, the present study demonstrates that patients in the ICU with COVID-19 present persistently abnormal laboratory findings and significant differences in laboratory trends of NLR, CRP, PLT and albumin, but not in WBC and neutrophil count, and fibrinogen and LDH levels, between survivors and non-survivors. The temporal progression of fibrinogen, CRP and NLR is affected by dexamethasone treatment.
RESUMO
In the context of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), laboratory medicine has played a crucial role in both diagnosis and severity assessment. Although the importance of baseline laboratory findings has been extensively reported, data regarding their evolution over the clinical course are limited. The aim of the present narrative review was to provide the dynamic changes of the routine laboratory variables reported in patients with severe COVID-19 over the course of their critical illness. A search was made of the literature for articles providing data on the time-course of routine laboratory tests in patients with severe COVID-19 during their stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). White blood cell, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, platelet counts, as well as D-dimer, fibrinogen, C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase and serum albumin levels were selected as disease characteristics and routine laboratory parameters. A total of 25 research articles reporting dynamic trends in the aforementioned laboratory parameters over the clinical course of severe COVID-19 were identified. During the follow-up period provided by each study, the majority of the laboratory values remained persistently abnormal in both survivors and non-survivors. Furthermore, in the majority of studies, the temporal trends of laboratory values distinctly differentiated patients between survivors and non-survivors. In conclusion, there are distinct temporal trends in selected routine laboratory parameters between survivors and non-survivors with severe COVID-19 admitted to the ICU, indicating their importance in the prognosis of clinical outcome.
RESUMO
Background: The aim of this study was to measure serum brain injury biomarkers in patients with COVID-19 admitted to intensive care unit (ICU), without evidence of brain impairment, and to determine potential correlations with systemic inflammatory markers, illness severity, and outcome. Methods: In patients admitted to the ICU with COVID-19, without clinical evidence of brain injury, blood S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B), neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were measured on admission. Clinical, routine laboratory data and illness severity were recorded. Comparisons between 28-day survivors and non-survivors and correlations of neurological biomarkers to other laboratory data and illness severity, were analyzed. Results: We included 50 patients, median age 64 [IQR 58-78] years, 39 (78%) males, 39 (78%) mechanically ventilated and 11 (22%) under high flow nasal oxygen treatment. S100B and NSE were increased in 19 (38%) and 45 (90%) patients, respectively. S100B was significantly elevated in non-survivors compared to survivors: 0.15 [0.10-0.29] versus 0.11 [0.07-0.17] µg/L, respectively, (p = 0.03), and significantly correlated with age, IL-6, arterial lactate, noradrenaline dose, illness severity and lymphocyte count. IL-6 was significantly correlated with C-reactive protein, noradrenaline dose and organ failure severity. NSE was correlated only with lactate dehydrogenase. Conclusion: Brain injury biomarkers were frequently elevated in COVID-19 ICU patients, in the absence of clinical evidence of brain injury. S100B was significantly correlated with IL-6, low lymphocyte count, hypoperfusion indices, illness severity, and short-term outcome. These findings indicate a possible brain astrocytes and neurons involvement, also suggesting a broader role of S100B in systemic inflammatory response.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: De-escalation of empirical antimicrobial therapy, a key component of antibiotic stewardship, is considered difficult in ICUs with high rates of antimicrobial resistance. OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility and the impact of antimicrobial de-escalation in ICUs with high rates of antimicrobial resistance. METHODS: Multicentre, prospective, observational study in septic patients with documented infections. Patients in whom de-escalation was applied were compared with patients without de-escalation by the use of a propensity score matching by SOFA score on the day of de-escalation initiation. RESULTS: A total of 262 patients (mean age 62.2 ± 15.1 years) were included. Antibiotic-resistant pathogens comprised 62.9%, classified as MDR (12.5%), extensively drug-resistant (49%) and pandrug-resistant (1.2%). In 97 (37%) patients de-escalation was judged not feasible in view of the antibiotic susceptibility results. Of the remaining 165 patients, judged as patients with de-escalation possibility, de-escalation was applied in 60 (22.9%). These were matched to an equal number of patients without de-escalation. In this subset of 120 patients, de-escalation compared with no de-escalation was associated with lower all-cause 28 day mortality (13.3% versus 36.7%, OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.11-0.66, P = 0.006); ICU and hospital mortality were also lower. De-escalation was associated with a subsequent collateral decrease in the SOFA score. Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed de-escalation as a significant factor for 28 day survival (HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.14-0.70, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: In ICUs with high levels of antimicrobial resistance, feasibility of antimicrobial de-escalation was limited because of the multi-resistant pathogens isolated. However, when de-escalation was feasible and applied, it was associated with lower mortality.
